Stereogum & Pitchfork 2018 charts: ridicolous

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
View previous topic :: View next topic
Author Message
Skinny
birdman_handrub.gif




  • #31
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 16:20
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Fischman wrote:
Yep.
A harsh term that may unfairly paint some folks with a same brush as others who actually deserve it.

I admit it.

It was a strong term to make a point... that popularity and artistic merit are not necessarily the same thing.

Meanwhile, you're false accusation was directed at a single person when there is ample evidence to the contrary, and contributed to making no point at all except your need to label someone because you don't like his POV.


You keep saying it's a false accusation as though you aren't an evident elitist with a proven predilection for prog.
_________________
2021 in full effect. Come drop me some recs. Y'all know what I like.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
RockyRaccoon
Is it solipsistic in here or is it just me?


Gender: Male
Age: 33
Location: Maryland
United States
Moderator

  • #32
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 16:31
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Fischman wrote:

Even closer to pure art, one need not be William Faulkner to know that Victor Hugo wrote greater literature than Tom Clancy... even though the latter has sold a lot more books.


I mean, in your opinion, sure. I know plenty of people who would prefer Clancy to Faulkner. Shit, my wife read Faulkner and hated it, and I can promise you she'd tell you she prefers Nicholas Sparks to Faulkner.

But I assume all those people are part of the mindless masses and their opinions don't matter.
_________________
2023 Chart

Early Psychedelic Rock

Electronic Chart
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
craola
crayon master



Location: pdx
United States

  • #33
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 17:30
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Fischman wrote:
Maybe I should have used a figure skating analogy instead since skaters are ranked on technical merit and artistic merit. Same thing applies. One need not be Peggy Fleming to know which skaters excel at the latter and which ones don't.

Figure skating, rhythmic gymnastics and women's artistic gymnastics all suffer from the "let's judge artistic" business though. It opens up the door too wide for cheating, and as someone working in the gymnastics industry, I can tell you there has been a lot of cheating over the years. I admit that I've read through the code for figure skating, and it's generally stronger than the aforementioned gymnastics disciplines, but I don't think you can justify judging a sport artistically. You can make the sport more artistic through demanding certain form requirements, element/skill requirements, groups, etc., but as soon as you cross the threshold into "eye of the beholder", you're short-selling the athletes. On that note, Rhythmic Gymnastics is getting a major overhaul right now because the IOC and the FIG essentially told them their sport is B.S., since the artistic component makes it more Cirque Du Soleil than Olympic sport. There were a couple dozen specific changes the FIG imposed on the Rhythmic Technical Committee (only half of which were followed through on so far), so it's slowly improving. But I've watched and judged the exercises. The results would be much different if you were only looking at the difficulty and execution scores. There are a couple of gymnasts in particular who are clearly, blatantly inferior to other girls on the floor, but when an eastern European gymnast who is scarcely an orchid of a woman walks out onto the floor, she gets a perfect artistic score simply for existing. This is a major problem.

As I stated previously, you don't have to be Usain Bolt to look good in running shoes. I'm pretty sure the folks modeling in all those shoe adverts spend less time in the gym than Tom Brady and Serena Williams. Art isn't about technical prowess and athleticism. It can have that element. It can rely solely on that if it wants to, but music is not sport. How boring that would be...

Fischman wrote:
Even closer to pure art, one need not be William Faulkner to know that Victor Hugo wrote greater literature than Tom Clancy... even though the latter has sold a lot more books.

Ah, I love Victor Hugo, but once again, it all depends on how "greater" is defined. There's no concensus on what "greatness" in art is. And as Rocky pointed out, plenty of folks would disagree with your assertion here. I haven't read any Tom Clancy to weigh in one way or another, but I know a handful of people who are turned off by Victor Hugo or simply wouldn't dare to invest themselves in something as lengthy as Les Miserables.

Look, I get it. I grew up an athlete competing at a high level against guys who would go on to compete in the Olympics, coached by guys with Olympic gold medals and World Championship titles. I came from a competitive world. I too find myself wanting to elevate the more athletic artists. The ones who push themselves to be "better", more technically sound, faster, stronger - what have you. But in the end, you have to separate art and sport. You can appreciate both for what they are. I don't think I'll be listening to much Brandi Carlyle for years to come, but I don't see the need to undersell what she's accomplished. Any degree of success in this industry is tough, and I would argue that connecting with people on any level is a success, indeed even qualifies it as quality music.
_________________
follow me on the bandcamp.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
gloriousgoo





  • #34
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 20:55
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Quote:
their skill is at tapping into hearts and minds of the generally population, which as we all know, ain't the brightest bunch.


This is legitimately embarrassing to read. I didn't think anyone other than edgy 15 year olds actually had this big of a chip on their shoulder. You, just like everyone else, are completely average in so many ways, you just happen to know a bit more about music.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
paladisiac
= music


Gender: Male
Location: Denver
United States

  • #35
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 21:41
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
i think pitchfork was brave to put Golden Hour by Kacey Musgraves at #2 but scared to put her at #1
_________________
fav artists NOW | ALL-TIME favs | i listen 2 more music than u so u don't have 2!
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
  • Visit poster's website
souplipton



Gender: Male
Location: Toronto
Canada

  • #36
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 22:56
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
These lists don't do it for me, and I don't like a lot of pop music on the radio, but can we not shit all over popular music for the "crime" of being popular. I might prefer prog and art rock, but making a hit record requires talent and presents different creative challenges than other forms of music, so it's unfair to just dismiss pop music just for being pop music. Judge the music on its own merits. There's great prog, and there's shitty prog. There's great pop, and there's shitty pop. Prog isn't entitled to greatness anymore than any other type of music just for being prog, and pop isn't doomed to be crap anymore than any other type of music just for being pop. Judge the music on its own merits.

Also, don't dismiss people's opinions if they don't agree with yours. Just because someone likes something that is popular, that doesn't mean that their opinion is any less valid. Let people enjoy the music they like. "The masses" may not agree with you, but that doesn't mean that everyone else is an idiot.

P.S. please don't group everyone who enjoys progressive rock into a single monolithic group of pretentious ass-hats. There are ass-hats who enjoy every genre, not just prog rock. Judge the music fan on their own merits.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
LedZep




Croatia (Hrvatska)

  • #37
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 23:05
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
Skinny wrote:
Always the prog snobs.
Always the "always the prog snubs" snubs. I love prog and have no problem with those year end lists, even when I don't like most of the albums. Which I usually do.
_________________
Finally updated the overall chart

2020s
90s
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
LedZep




Croatia (Hrvatska)

  • #38
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 23:14
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
And about Hugo, Faulkner and cheap literature... Isn't the thing that makes books, movies etc. "classic" and "good" their ability to withstand the test of time? Of course that's not definitive or 100% correct criteria, but it's a thought.
_________________
Finally updated the overall chart

2020s
90s
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Skinny
birdman_handrub.gif




  • #39
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 23:26
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
LedZep wrote:
Skinny wrote:
Always the prog snobs.
Always the "always the prog snubs" snubs. I love prog and have no problem with those year end lists, even when I don't like most of the albums. Which I usually do.


One can be a prog fan without being a prog snob. Fischman can't manage it, though.
_________________
2021 in full effect. Come drop me some recs. Y'all know what I like.
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
cestuneblague
Edgy to the Choir



Location: MA/FL

  • #40
  • Posted: 12/17/2018 23:32
  • Post subject:
  • Reply with quote
What about the "Rock Opera" snobs?
Back to top
  • Visit poster's website
  • View user's profile
  • Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.
All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Page 4 of 7


 

Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Similar Topics
Topic Author Forum
pitchfork decade charts? alelsupreme Suggestions
Recognised 2018 Charts lylecatcliffe Music
[ Poll ] Pitchfork Discussion Revolution909 Music
Pitchfork absorbed by GQ stangetzaway Music
Pitchfork: top tracks, 90s Guest Music

 
Back to Top