1969 (studio album)
by Gabor Szabo
Top albums of 1969 (
Price
eBay
Condition: Used
Gabor Szabo bestography
1969 is ranked 5th best out of 12 albums by Gabor Szabo on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by Gabor Szabo is Dreams which is ranked number 6038 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 217.
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Upcoming concerts
Listen to 1969 on YouTube
1969 track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 75 out of 100 (4 out of 11 tracks have been rated).
0
1969 rankings
All 7 charts that this album appears in:
| Year | Source | Chart | Rank | Rank Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | TodFitz | Top 100 Music Albums of 1969 | 78/100 | 1 |
| 2025 |  Norman Bates | Top 100 Music Albums of 1969 | 89/100 | 1 |
| 2025 |  Fischman | Top 100 Music Albums of 1969 | 42/100 | 3 |
| 2024 |  Graeme2 | Top 83 Music Albums of 1969 | 69/83 | 1 |
| 2022 |  bonafini | Top 37 Music Albums of 1969 | 26/37 | 2 |
| 2019 | Fischman | My Top Jazz Albums of 1969 | 17/40 | - |
| 2018 | glynspsa | Top 100 Music Albums of 1969 | 99/100 | 0 |
| Total Charts: The total number of charts that this album has appeared in. | 7 | |||
| Total Rank Score: The total rank score. | 7 | |||
You can include this album in your own chart from the My Charts page!
1969 collection
Showing all 2 members who have this album in their collection
1969 ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 10 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
75/100  | 01/31/2025 21:04 | jnmayles | | 73/100 |
65/100 | 09/08/2023 17:40 |  OldToad | | 74/100 |
70/100 | 04/19/2020 00:16 | BorderFreeAndrew | | 74/100 |
65/100 | 12/22/2018 19:49 | Fischman | | 66/100 |
75/100 | 09/13/2018 01:11 | TodFitz | | 63/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album has a Bayesian average rating of 73.4/100, a mean average of 74.5/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 74.5/100. The standard deviation for this album is 8.8.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
1969 comments
Showing all 1 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
OldToad 09/08/2023 17:35
Not Szabo's best, that's for sure. I have a soft spot for this sort of approach to instrumental covers of pop tunes--sort of like Booker T & the MGs--and I love Szabo's playing style, but this whole thing sounds muffled and fuzzy, and the performances...maybe could have used another take on some of these tracks, I think he leaves a little meat on the bone. There are much better Gabor Szabo albums (The Sorcerer, High Contrast, Spellbinder, Jazz Raga eg) but even here I get a kick out of listening to his explorations of this kind of style on short pop covers.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for 1969
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
