Mumford & Sons 
The best album credited to Mumford & Sons is Sigh No More which is ranked number 1,042 in the overall greatest album chart with a total rank score of 1,663.
Mumford & Sons is ranked number 711 in the overall artist rankings with a total rank score of 2,465.
- Members: N.B. The member list may not contain a full list of members (and there may be notable omissions). If a member has never released a solo album, or their solo albums do not appear on BEA, they will not be able to be listed as a member. These omissions are not meant to cause offense to anybody. The member list is solely meant as an additional navigation aid to browse between the items listed on the site.
- Marcus Mumford
eBay
Condition: New
eBay
Condition: New
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Mumford & Sons on YouTube
Mumford & Sons best albums
The following albums by Mumford & Sons are ranked highest in the greatest album charts:
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
- #Sponsored
Mumford & Sons bestography composition
Mumford & Sons best tracks
Include tracks from compilations & live albums | Exclude tracks from compilations & live albums The same track can appear on multiple albums, so excluding tracks from compilations and live albums helps to remove duplicates from this list.
Mumford & Sons ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this artist. | Show all 66 ratings for this artist.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Artist ratings | Avg. artist rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 06/29/2025 13:50 | LosWochos | 7,601 | 79/100 |
| ! | 09/23/2023 10:15 | Stevo796 | 980 | 74/100 |
| ! | 09/12/2023 21:12 |  paladisiac | 1,035 | 67/100 |
| ! | 03/31/2022 01:05 | Moondance | 430 | 75/100 |
| ! | 12/06/2021 01:11 | SD100852 | 212 | 64/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some artists can have several thousand ratings)
This artist has a Bayesian average rating of 62.4/100, a mean average of 60.4/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 60.4/100. The standard deviation for this artist is 23.9.
Mumford & Sons favourites
Showing all 6 members who have added this artist as a favourite
Mumford & Sons comments
Showing latest 10 comments | Show all 14 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
I like these guys - my son likes these guys - it is a band that connects me & my son - and for that I am most grateful. The comments above - ie they have a formula and it works for them - is a far comment.
I'd give them credit for having a distinctive sound and being decent musicians, I just find a lot of their songs sound very similar to each other
junodog4 03/20/2015 23:57 | #137406
I think I've nailed down why I'm neither impressed or disgusted by these guys: They found a formula that works for them (building verses, soaring chorus, galloping banjo) and put it on repeat for most of their albums. They're pleasant songs, but when you've heard one... I find their best tracks are the ones that don't follow this pattern. Sadly, they are the exception.
On another note - anyone else notice a more repetitive Dave Matthews sound here?
This comment is beneath your viewing threshold.
SuedeSwede 02/19/2014 22:36 | #103662
Sigh No More was nice! Babel was just... ew.
I also agree with nutso and Happymeal. Yeah, they're overrated and that, but for pop they're brilliant. And they're definitely not overrated.
Saying that, I'm not a massive fan. Seriously, Babel was just so fucking awful.
I feel like its so cool to hate them now simply because they made the mistake of selling albums. In a chart wasteland where the likes of Nickelback and Maroon 5 are the biggest bands around, a group this talented breaking big should be cherished instead of being treated as the enemy. They've earned their success
I think Junodog4 has got it spot on
overated
No.. Just do not like..
KBJAG 02/12/2013 20:07 | #64877
Put a bunch of dudes with acoustic guitars, banjos and cello's, trying to sound folk and get a lot of attention of the popular masses. That's what they are.
They're pretty overhyped but they're an ok-ish modern band.
Your feedback for Mumford & Sons
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
| Best Ever Artists | |
|---|---|
| 1. The Beatles | |
| 2. Radiohead | |
| 3. Pink Floyd | |
| 4. David Bowie | |
| 5. Bob Dylan | |
| 6. Led Zeppelin | |
| 7. The Rolling Stones | |
| 8. Arcade Fire | |
| 9. Nirvana | |
| 10. The Velvet Underground | |
| 11. Neil Young | |
| 12. Kendrick Lamar | |
| 13. Miles Davis | |
| 14. The Smiths | |
| 15. The Beach Boys | |
| 16. R.E.M. | |
| 17. Kanye West | |
| 18. Pixies | |
| 19. Bruce Springsteen | |
| 20. Jimi Hendrix |
