No. 2
by The Rolling Stones

No. 2 by The Rolling Stones
Year: 1965
Release date: 1965-01-15
Overall rank: 6,347th   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
70/100 (from 191 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top albums of 1965 (52nd)
Award Top albums of of the 1960s (477th)
Award Best albums of all time (6,347th)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

The Rolling Stones bestography

No. 2 is ranked 28th best out of 105 albums by The Rolling Stones on BestEverAlbums.com.

The best album by The Rolling Stones is Exile On Main St. which is ranked number 49 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 18,165.

The Rolling Stones album bestography « Higher ranked (5,967th)
A Bigger Bang
This album (6,347th)
No. 2
Lower ranked (6,938th) »
Stripped

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to No. 2 on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

No. 2 rankings

No. 2 rankings summary
Overall rank: 6,347th | 1960s rank: 477th | 1965 rank: 52nd  Overall chart history
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings).Help Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 4 hours ago)

No. 2 collection

No. 2 ratings

Average Rating: 
70/100 (from 191 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this album.  | Show all 191 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
55/100
 !
09/29/2026 09:58 Siromynian  Ratings distribution  1,78974/100
 
60/100
 !
08/30/2026 06:47 marcoserra1966  Ratings distribution  88859/100
 
80/100
 !
04/23/2026 18:56 spinout  Ratings distribution  3,53081/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album has a Bayesian average rating of 69.8/100, a mean average of 69.1/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 69.7/100. The standard deviation for this album is 13.9.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

No. 2 favourites

Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite  | Show all 11 members

No. 2 forum mentions

This album has been referenced 7 times on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“1010”
View topic (3 mentions) →

“18:30”
View topic (3 mentions) →

From kokkinos 09/22/2022 21:19 in I'm going back to the start
“(and its US counterpart) The – admittedly confusing and annoying – tendency to differentiate between the UK and the US versions of their records keeps going strong. Another thing that’s repeated from their previous efforts is their focus on covers, three originals out of twelve in the UK versions…”
View post →

No. 2 comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 9 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
"Rolling Stones No. 2" spent 10 weeks at number 1 on the UK charts. The LP contains the proper version of "Somebody To Love" whereby "Now!" contains a studio run through. The proper version was not released in the States until ABKCO tacked it on to a compilation album with their release of the SACD's in 2002. This LP also contains a great cover of Muddy Waters' "I Can't Be Satisfied" with great slide work from Brian Jones. Four tracks from this LP were recorded at Chess Studios where the Stones always sounded their best as opposed to Regent Sound and RCA Hollywood. These four tracks were recorded in genuine stereo and were released in stereo on the SACD's. By ranking this LP so low, "Best Ever Albums" displays a basic misunderstanding of the importance of the British Invasion in general and the Stones in particular. While The Beatles were a better group, Jones had no wish to commercialize the blues and consequently, as faithfully as possible, fed our own African-American musical heritage back to us which most individuals of the Caucasian persuasion had never heard because "race records" did not enjoy airplay on radio stations geared to the masses.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 2
Log in to reply
Rating:  
65/100
The second UK stones album lacks the spark of their debut. It's pretty much the same content as the first, rock'n'roll covers, ballads, and a couple of generic originals. Best tracks are, down home girl, under the boardwalk, (which the stones really make their own, regardless of their bad boy image), and the excellent, time is on my side. The stones originals, what a shame, off the hook, and grown up wrong, are the kind of songs the stones would become master's of in a year or two, but at this time they're just average rock/blues tracks. As I said, it doesn't quite have the bite of it's predecessor, but is still fun to listen to, knowing the genius to come. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Log in to reply
Rating:  
75/100
From 01/26/2016 15:20 | #157818 | TOP COMMENT Help Vote up your preferred comments and the comments with the most votes will be flagged.
I feel this album was recorded in kind of a rush. Solid though, I miss the days when the Stones had something to prove.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Log in to reply
Rating:  
60/100
I have the American version, Now! This is a great early album from them, packed with energy.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Log in to reply
Rating:  
85/100
Very solid early stones
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Log in to reply
Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Join the conversation!.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.