Amok
by Atoms For Peace
Listen & Collect
Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.
Atoms For Peace bestography
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Listen to Amok on YouTube
Amok track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 83 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
Top-rated track as rated by BestEverAlbums.com members.
Amok rankings
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings). Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 6 hours ago)
| Year | Source | Chart | Rank | Rank Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Vasco | Top 100 Music Albums of the 2010s | 18/100 | 17 |
| 2026 | Top 20 Music Albums of 2013 | 13/20 | 2 | |
| 2026 | Skerns | Top 65 Music Albums of the 2010s | 12/65 | 17 |
| 2026 | Foxforce5 | Top 100 Music Albums of the 2010s | 96/100 | 1 |
| 2026 | Top 15 Music Albums of 2013 | 7/15 | 3 | |
| 2026 | Top 100 Music Albums of the 2010s | 63/100 | 8 | |
| 2026 | tyleraepps | Top 15 Music Albums of 2013 | 9/15 | 2 |
| 2026 | bonnequestion | Top 19 Music Albums of 2013 | 9/19 | 3 |
| 2026 | Top 28 Music Albums of 2013 | 28/28 | 0 | |
| 2026 | Top 15 Music Albums of 2013 | 9/15 | 2 | |
| Total Charts: The total number of charts that this album has appeared in. | 363 | |||
| Total Rank Score: The total rank score. | 1,806 | |||
Amok collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 216 members
Amok ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 3 ratings for this album. | Show all 597 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 09/08/2026 01:43 | xhitmanx | 1,604 | 75/100 |
| ! | 07/12/2026 20:47 | liquidbottle | 775 | 82/100 |
| ! | 05/25/2026 22:49 | tyleraepps | 484 | 83/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album is rated in the top 9% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 74.8/100, a mean average of 73.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 74.9/100. The standard deviation for this album is 15.4.
Amok favourites
Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite | Show all 92 members
Amok forum mentions
Amok comments
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
The main problems i have with AMOK i had with The Eraser and The King Of Limbs. 01) The songs are too abstract and not melodic. Yes, this is a style change from Thom Yorke that is probably here to stay. Shuffling, dubstep-wanting, dissonant beats flitter behind and around his vocals, sometimes interesting, sometimes unoriginally ad-infinitum. This wouldn't be as big a deal if the lyrical content was presented with more structure. That leads me to... 02) I'm not sure why Thom has predominantly sung in a high octave on his last few releases, but this gives the songs less "teeth" and results in less song-by-song "variety". After three albums in this approximate template, "In Rainbows" seems like it was recorded decades ago.. (Edited)
I like Radiohead, but you guys have too much of a stranglehold on this website particularly when this side project has managed to be the top album of 2013. In all honesty no-one else but Radiohead fans are interested in this. (Edited)
Everyone of course this sounds like Thom Yorke's solo project. The reason the band formed was to initially perform songs from The Eraser live, a few years later they decided to release an album so that's why it sounds similar. Flea is so talented, you think the only way he knows how to play bass is the funky RHCP way, no he can do this too. This isn't supposed to sound like a brand new band it's a continuation of The Eraser. And it's freaking amazing. (Edited)
This is a massively underrated album. It's definitely a grower and deserves headphone immersion to appreciate the genius in the composition and layering of sounds. It needs to be properly reviewed only after listening to it at least a dozen or so times. A review on first listen is an injustice. The song Amok, for example continues to grow on me and I've listened to it many many times. Let go of your Radiohead prejudices and listen with brand new ears. (Edited)
I would have hoped for more influence from Flea. It does sound more like Nigel and Thom up to their usual stuff. You can tell Flea is playing with his distinct style, but musically it sounds nothing like Flea would've written and everything like Nigel and Thom. It's not bad, but not brilliant either.
EDIT:
Just started listening to Stuck Together Pieces... There's some Flea.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.
