Amok
by Atoms For Peace

Amok by Atoms For Peace
Year: 2013
Release date: 2013-02-25
Overall rank: 961st   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
75/100 (from 597 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top 20 albums of 2013 (14th)
Award Top albums of of the 2010s (136th)
Award Top 1,000 albums of all time (961st)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.
eBay
Sorry, no matches on eBay for "Amok Atoms For Peace".

  My favourite store:  

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

Atoms For Peace bestography

Atoms For Peace album bestography « Higher ranked
-
This album (961st)
Amok
Lower ranked »
-

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to Amok on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

Amok track list

  Track ratings The tracks on this album have an average rating of 83 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).

Sort Sort by
#
Track
Rating/Comments
1.
Track pick (850 - 163 votes)
Average Rating: 85 (163 votes)Comments: View 1
3.
Track pick (850 - 158 votes)
Average Rating: 85 (158 votes)Comments: View 1

Track pick (1000 - 100 votes) Top-rated track as rated by BestEverAlbums.com members.

Amok rankings

Amok rankings summary
Overall rank: 961st | 2010s rank: 136th | 2013 rank: 14th  Overall chart history
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings).Help Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 6 hours ago)

Amok collection

Amok ratings

Average Rating: 
75/100 (from 597 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this album.  | Show all 597 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
65/100
 !
09/08/2026 01:43 xhitmanx  Ratings distribution  1,60475/100
 
75/100
 !
07/12/2026 20:47 liquidbottle  Ratings distribution  77582/100
 
85/100
 !
05/25/2026 22:49 tyleraepps  Ratings distribution  48483/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album is rated in the top 9% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 74.8/100, a mean average of 73.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 74.9/100. The standard deviation for this album is 15.4.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

Amok favourites

Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite  | Show all 92 members

Amok forum mentions

This album has been referenced 124 times on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“Today's chart of the day Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by UnliveableWilts () 1. by by (1998) 3. by by (1972) 5. by (1973) 6. by (1969) 7. by (1999) 8. (2005) 9. by (1992) 11. by (2010) 12. (1996) 13. by (1993) 14. by (1966) 15. by (1996) 16. by (1977) 18. by (1984) 19. by (2011) 20. (1970) 23. by…”
View forum post →

“The overall chart is ever changing, and it's difficult to keep up with the detail of what's happening. So, for those people who are interested, this post attempts to show the latest movements - biggest climbers, movers, new entries and leavers for the top 100, 250, 500 & 1000 over the past month,…”
View forum post →

“Today's chart of the day Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by Vasco () 1. by (1994) 2. by (1979) 3. by (1977) 5. (2012) 7. (1982) 9. by by (1990) 12. by (1989) 14. by (2023) 15. (2019) 16. (1998) 17. by (2013) 20. by (1973) 21. by (2024) 22. (1992) 23. by (2022) 24. by (2006) 25. by (1975) 26. by…”
View forum post →

View all forum mentions

Amok comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 58 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
Rating:  
65/100
The main problems i have with AMOK i had with The Eraser and The King Of Limbs. 01) The songs are too abstract and not melodic. Yes, this is a style change from Thom Yorke that is probably here to stay. Shuffling, dubstep-wanting, dissonant beats flitter behind and around his vocals, sometimes interesting, sometimes unoriginally ad-infinitum. This wouldn't be as big a deal if the lyrical content was presented with more structure. That leads me to... 02) I'm not sure why Thom has predominantly sung in a high octave on his last few releases, but this gives the songs less "teeth" and results in less song-by-song "variety". After three albums in this approximate template, "In Rainbows" seems like it was recorded decades ago.. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 6
I like Radiohead, but you guys have too much of a stranglehold on this website particularly when this side project has managed to be the top album of 2013. In all honesty no-one else but Radiohead fans are interested in this. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 8
Rating:  
80/100
Everyone of course this sounds like Thom Yorke's solo project. The reason the band formed was to initially perform songs from The Eraser live, a few years later they decided to release an album so that's why it sounds similar. Flea is so talented, you think the only way he knows how to play bass is the funky RHCP way, no he can do this too. This isn't supposed to sound like a brand new band it's a continuation of The Eraser. And it's freaking amazing. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Rating:  
95/100
This is a massively underrated album. It's definitely a grower and deserves headphone immersion to appreciate the genius in the composition and layering of sounds. It needs to be properly reviewed only after listening to it at least a dozen or so times. A review on first listen is an injustice. The song Amok, for example continues to grow on me and I've listened to it many many times. Let go of your Radiohead prejudices and listen with brand new ears. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Rating:  
90/100
I would have hoped for more influence from Flea. It does sound more like Nigel and Thom up to their usual stuff. You can tell Flea is playing with his distinct style, but musically it sounds nothing like Flea would've written and everything like Nigel and Thom. It's not bad, but not brilliant either.

EDIT:
Just started listening to Stuck Together Pieces... There's some Flea.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Join the conversation!.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.