The Science Of Things
by Bush
Bush bestography
The Science Of Things is ranked 5th best out of 14 albums by Bush on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by Bush is Sixteen Stone which is ranked number 1706 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 994.
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Upcoming concerts
Listen to The Science Of Things on YouTube
The Science Of Things track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 74 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
The Science Of Things rankings
TheDarkOrb
paladisiac
PAPPITUFO
zwiebel
Mercury
Kaiser
EastwoodThe Science Of Things collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 28 members
The Science Of Things ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 55 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 12/05/2025 22:44 | Araldo | 1,471 | 80/100 |
| ! | 07/18/2025 15:13 |  Milhaud | 1,734 | 70/100 |
| ! | 03/03/2025 10:43 |  videoheadcleaner | 12,227 | 85/100 |
| ! | 01/22/2024 16:47 | Cyrax | 1,766 | 61/100 |
| ! | 10/16/2023 18:33 |  MetalMan67 | 5,957 | 71/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album has a Bayesian average rating of 65.5/100, a mean average of 64.3/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 64.3/100. The standard deviation for this album is 13.2.
The Science Of Things favourites
Showing all 2 members who have added this album as a favourite
The Science Of Things comments
Showing all 6 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
jeremy9 10/09/2019 11:50 | #243576
Very secondary album. It was all there
Brad1770 01/06/2018 05:02 | #204691
Woof ! . This album is a dumpster fire , other than ' Chemicals Between Us' the rest is ho hum.
Bush realizes after a couple albums that they sound pretty similar and have little potential musically.
So on The Science of Things they add some bloops and bleeps electronically to mix it up.
It is all a ho hum drab affair apart from a couple decent tracks.
Warm Machine is actually pretty good and is on par with the best from their debut.
Let the Cables Sleep is a really good atmospheric ballad but sophomoric in it's musicianship.
This is all power chords strummed or plucked.
Jesus Online wasn't good to start but with the passing of time and technology advancement, it is downright embarrassing.
The Chemicals Between Us is the other potential keeper here and the most well known song from the album. It sounds awfully 90's and as poppy as Bush gets.
Otherwise the rest of this is an easy pass
junodog4 07/01/2014 02:27 | #115730
Me too. Pass.
lightmyway 05/08/2012 00:44 | #41787
Here they try to throw in some electronic sounds. It's a controversial move for a reason. Of all the 90s bands you'd expect to try to pull that shit, Bush would have been one of the last. There are some really good songs here though.
pearljammer13 12/15/2011 02:34 | #32998
I'll take a pass on this one.
Your feedback for The Science Of Things
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
