Bromst (studio album)
by Dan Deacon
Dan Deacon bestography
Bromst is ranked as the best album by Dan Deacon.
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Upcoming concerts




Listen to Bromst on YouTube
Bromst track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 78 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
Bromst rankings
Bromst collection
Showing all 14 members who have this album in their collection
Bromst ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 43 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 10/06/2025 07:17 | TonySayers61 | 23,185 | 64/100 |
| ! | 06/10/2025 06:31 | Fevernova | 3,136 | 82/100 |
| ! | 02/11/2025 13:25 | cicadelic | 11,417 | 73/100 |
| ! | 09/25/2024 02:04 | juanr1096 | 6,094 | 78/100 |
| ! | 12/29/2023 18:06 | 22,857 | 69/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album is rated in the top 6% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 75.8/100, a mean average of 76.6/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 76.6/100. The standard deviation for this album is 9.9.
Bromst favourites
Showing all 5 members who have added this album as a favourite
Bromst comments
Showing all 3 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
Experimental and interesting, but has a tendency to be shrill, unnecessarily repetitive and frankly annoying. A difficult album to get through, only redeemed by the clear intellect behind the way it chooses to experiment.
cool album, experimental and poppy at the same time!
Very ENO-istic.
Deacon's mastery at melding synth, computer and sample compositions is pretty awesome. None of these songs are boring. There are so many interesting layers that build on top of each other, it's nuts. Like "embryonic" (by the flaming lips), this album is pretty musically dense too, but while embryonic's density is a result of a "wall of fuzz'n'bass", deacon's is more a result of a ton of musical ideas layered into a frenetic whirlwind of saccharin-sweet delights. I'm kind of amazed at how much I like this album, because I'm usually partial to vocals and deacon's vocals are generally not the focus of each song. This is a testament to how good of songs he composes, mostly on computer. He's also not as cornball as he was on "spiderman of the rings" which gives his compositions more weight. This is noise pop at its finest.
Your feedback for Bromst
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.



