Undercover (studio album) by The Rolling Stones
Safe Mode: On Certain images on this site may contain sensitive content and are flagged as 'unsafe'. BestEverAlbums.com does not display these images by default, but you may choose to show or hide these images from your profile page. If you choose to hide these images, you'll see an image with a warning message instead of the actual image. If you choose to show them, you'll see these images no differently than regular (safe) images.
Top albums of 1983 (The Rolling Stones bestography
Undercover is ranked 35th best out of 101 albums by The Rolling Stones on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by The Rolling Stones is Exile On Main St. which is ranked number 44 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 20,946.
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Undercover on YouTube
Undercover track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 71 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
2
Undercover rankings
Latest 20 charts that this album appears in:
cestuneblague
Wasinski
sssvnnn
TamthebamYou can include this album in your own chart from the My Charts page!
Undercover collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 107 members
Undercover ratings
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 195 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
40/100  | 3 days ago |  AAL2014 | | 75/100 |
65/100 | 06/17/2025 20:57 | Garyf1972 | | 68/100 |
75/100 | 01/24/2025 18:45 | Fevernova | | 82/100 |
50/100 | 01/21/2025 13:50 | JamesMowbray | | 70/100 |
65/100 | 11/13/2024 21:14 | Hemo | | 81/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album has a Bayesian average rating of 62.2/100, a mean average of 61.1/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 61.7/100. The standard deviation for this album is 16.6.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to leave a rating
Undercover favourites
Showing all 8 members who have added this album as a favourite
Undercover comments
Showing latest 10 comments | Show all 12 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Maximum Rated First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
Of course 80's haters are gonna hate this. It's not their best album but it's still good. Tracks 1, 2, 6, 8 and 10 are great.
A poor attempt to stay relevent
Don't really know what they were going for on this thing, not really a single song I like. Easily the worst Stones record i've heard yet.
llibnanoon 06/18/2020 14:38
Not thier best but a few great tracks.
Sandrof1969 02/11/2018 16:09
I've always thought this is the worst Stones album
Fischman 01/11/2017 23:24
This album could have fared better with better production and some more meat and classic Stones attitude in a few of the songs. It's not dreadful, but it's nothing to get excited about either.
Them crappy 80s sounds.
The songs are not as bad. Undercover and She was hot where pretty good stonesque-classic-rocks. There's some interesting guitar work on Too much blood and the chorus of Tie you up with that free-tempo landings and laidbackness couldn't have been made by anyone besides the Stones.
Still overall sounds as plastic as pretty much every other rock album made during that era.
I think Undercover is yet another underrated stones album. They never seem to get any credit for trying new sounds. This is a much more contemporary record with a really interesting use of percussion, especially on the title track, which I have to admit is the last of the truly great stones tracks. Having said that, there are other standouts such as the hilarious too much blood and the grooving feel on baby. Sure, there's a few stones by numbers but at least half the album is fantastic. There's nothing really awful but it does need a few spins to fully appreciate it.
A forgettable record. It's got the 80's malady, stupid pointless songs with crappy production.
junodog4 10/13/2014 19:28
1980s Stones were pretty mediocre. This album is a perfect example of that.
Please log in or register if you want to be able to add a comment
Your feedback for Undercover
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.