Tubular Bells II
by Mike Oldfield

Tubular Bells II by Mike Oldfield
Year: 1992
Release date: 1992-08-31
Overall rank: 5,887th   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
70/100 (from 86 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top albums of 1992 (102nd)
Award Top albums of of the 1990s (956th)
Award Best albums of all time (5,887th)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY
Sorry, no matches on eBay for "Tubular Bells II Mike Oldfield".

  My favourite store:  

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

Mike Oldfield bestography

Tubular Bells II is ranked 5th best out of 36 albums by Mike Oldfield on BestEverAlbums.com.

The best album by Mike Oldfield is Tubular Bells which is ranked number 518 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 3,348.

Mike Oldfield album bestography « Higher ranked (3,930th)
Hergest Ridge
This album (5,887th)
Tubular Bells II
Lower ranked (5,918th) »
Amarok

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to Tubular Bells II on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

Tubular Bells II rankings

Tubular Bells II rankings summary
Overall rank: 5,887th | 1990s rank: 956th | 1992 rank: 102nd  Overall chart history
(Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings). (Last updated: 2 hours ago).

Tubular Bells II collection

Tubular Bells II ratings

Average Rating: 
70/100 (from 86 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 5 ratings for this album.  | Show all 86 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
90/100
 !
07/03/2026 05:29 stangetzaway  Ratings distribution  2,31084/100
 
75/100
 !
05/31/2026 22:30 mrmcrook  Ratings distribution  1,10477/100
 
65/100
 !
04/28/2026 20:21 Helios  Ratings distribution  6,20869/100
 
100/100
 !
01/03/2026 11:45 muller72  Ratings distribution  3183/100
 
50/100
 !
12/12/2025 01:11 MadhattanJack  Ratings distribution  5,98766/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album has a Bayesian average rating of 70.1/100, a mean average of 69.8/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 69.8/100. The standard deviation for this album is 18.7.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

Tubular Bells II favourites

Showing all 12 members who have added this album as a favourite

Tubular Bells II comments

Showing all 3 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)

Rating:  
75/100
It's good but every time the original theme recurs and comes into play within with some degree of variance added, I can't help but think of how epic and brilliant the original is. Due to that, even though there's some good pieces within this, it detracts from the overall expertise and accomplishment of the album. If you'd never heard the original Tubular Bells, your opinion of this would probably be way higher than if you had.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) | 0 votes (0 helpful | 0 unhelpful)
Rating:  
50/100
The original Tubular Bells is a classic and was even ahead of it's time. But the synths on this are so dated. It somehow sounds even more dated than the original that came out 19 years before it.
I do recognize the skill in composing and arranging this album, and I do enjoy the tracks Weightless, The Great Plain and Red Dawn. And kudos to you if you really enjoy the whole thing. But compare this to the debut albums of Aphex Twin & The Prodigy that were released the same year. It's like they are made in different worlds.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) | 0 votes (0 helpful | 0 unhelpful)
Rating:  
95/100
Never considered a classic and a real shame for that. This LP takes the original Tubular Bells template, changes the melodies and updates the production values but keeps the structure intact, producing a wonderful facsimile of the pioneering 1973 album. This time around, the tracks are split up into bite sized chunks, as opposed to the side-long epics of its forebearer. Let's be honest, this will never be a cool album but if you can listen with unprejudiced ears, you might just enjoy what you hear.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) | +1 votes (1 helpful | 0 unhelpful)

Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to add a comment

Your feedback for Tubular Bells II

Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Leave a comment or rate it below.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.
Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments and join the discussion.