Tubular Bells 2003
by Mike Oldfield
eBay
Condition: Good
Mike Oldfield bestography
Tubular Bells 2003 is ranked 20th best out of 36 albums by Mike Oldfield on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by Mike Oldfield is Tubular Bells which is ranked number 528 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 3,296.
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Upcoming concerts
Listen to Tubular Bells 2003 on YouTube
Tubular Bells 2003 track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 76 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
Tubular Bells 2003 rankings
| Year | Source | Chart | Rank | Rank Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | fabm0 | List 2003 Pt 2 | 16/30 | - |
| 2025 |  sssvnnn | Tubular Bells | 2/19 | - |
| 2025 | sssvnnn | Top 80 Music Albums of 2003 | 9/80 | 5 |
| 2024 | iancrockert141 | Top 30 Music Albums of 2003 | 20/30 | 2 |
| 2023 |  AlexSVK | Top 10 Music Albums of 2003 | 6/10 | 3 |
| 2022 |  kadupheming | Top 68 Music Albums of 2003 | 64/68 | 0 |
| 2020 |  guzguzgarbit | Top 40 Music Albums of 2003 | 37/40 | 1 |
| 2018 |  bertrandu | Top 100 Music Albums of 2003 | 72/100 | 1 |
| 2017 |  JoSt | Top 50 Music Albums of 2003 | 18/50 | 3 |
| 2017 | JoSt | Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | 32/100 | 14 |
| Total Charts: The total number of charts that this album has appeared in. | 10 | |||
| Total Rank Score: The total rank score. | 28 | |||
Tubular Bells 2003 collection
Showing all 9 members who have this album in their collection
Tubular Bells 2003 ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 18 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01/15/2026 14:09 | Leginlists | 2,537 | 84/100 | |
| 03/04/2025 11:50 | fabm0 | 6,859 | 59/100 | |
| 09/17/2024 03:25 | dhbarrett | 8,348 | 65/100 | |
| 01/23/2023 15:09 | AlexSVK | 1,087 | 62/100 | |
| 07/20/2022 02:19 |  eddieWilson | 679 | 72/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album is rated in the top 6% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 75.6/100, a mean average of 77.5/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 77.5/100. The standard deviation for this album is 13.9.
Tubular Bells 2003 favourites
Showing all 1 members who have added this album as a favourite
Tubular Bells 2003 comments
Showing all 4 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
sssvnnn 09/09/2020 21:18 | #257970
Good.
Brad1770 09/24/2018 01:18 | #221565
Edit update
“Viv Stanshell is 100% IRREPLACEABLE % “
An interesting update to Mike Oldfield's groundbreaking 1973 debut album. As has been noted here, Oldfield wanted to fix the faults he always felt the original suffered from - a result of recording it quickly, and with limited equipment. The result is a far better produced album, and with a good deal going for it. The elements are all still here, with a brighter sound and more of a twinkle throughout. Headphones work particularly well. I share the opinion that there is some of the charm lost from the original album, however - the rough-and-ready feel of it is part of what made it a classic. If you're new to Tubular Bells, go for the 1973 version. If you're a fan of that and want to hear what it would sound like produced at the turn of the millennium, give it a whirl. It's a very good album, but it doesn't quite match up to the first time around.
Brad1770 05/26/2018 02:18 | #215611
I cant believe no one has commented on this album yet , that be as it may I'm going to
So , the genesis for this release was 2 fold:
(1) Celebrate the 30 year anniversary of the original 'Tubular Bell' release
and
(2) Mike Oldfield wanting to fix what he saw as faults on the original release and in particular some out of tune instruments
So is it any good ? Yes and No
Yes: the production is great on this one , with the tracks sounding bright , sparkling and modern . The tracks pump from a stereo like a house getting a bright lick of paint. Also the entire album is broken down to 17 tracks making it easier to follow
No: the 1973 charm of the original is lost here , and is definitely poorer for it . Also John Cleese has replaced Viv Stanshall and it doesn't work , quite frankly John Cleese sounds too John Cleeseish ! Viv Stanshall is 100% replaceable . Also the "Caveman" section is here but replaced with 2 Cave-people a Male and a Female voice & it just doesn't work
Interesting but stick to the original IMO
60/100
Your feedback for Tubular Bells 2003
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.
