The Division Bell
by Pink Floyd
Pink Floyd bestography
The Division Bell is ranked 7th best out of 35 albums by Pink Floyd on BestEverAlbums.com.
The best album by Pink Floyd is The Dark Side Of The Moon which is ranked number 2 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 59,271.
(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).
Upcoming concerts






Listen to The Division Bell on YouTube
The Division Bell track list
The tracks on this album have an average rating of 81 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).
Top-rated track as rated by BestEverAlbums.com members.
The Division Bell rankings
The Division Bell collection
Showing latest 20 members who have this album in their collection | Show all 531 members
The Division Bell ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 5 ratings for this album. | Show all 1,185 ratings for this album.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Album ratings | Avg. album rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 02/10/2026 19:39 | AdamRP | 13 | 63/100 |
| ! | 01/24/2026 16:39 | Bluedog | 165 | 73/100 |
| ! | 01/23/2026 16:58 | hebbo137 | 199 | 79/100 |
| ! | 01/15/2026 00:44 | matterhornrider | 4,906 | 81/100 |
| ! | 01/15/2026 00:06 | This_is_handsome | 769 | 79/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)
This album is rated in the top 16% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 74.1/100, a mean average of 73.0/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 74.1/100. The standard deviation for this album is 17.7.
The Division Bell favourites
Showing latest 20 members who have added this album as a favourite | Show all 167 members
The Division Bell comments
Showing latest 10 comments | Show all 62 comments |
Most Helpful First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First |
Longest Comments First
(Only showing comments with -2 votes or higher. You can alter this threshold from your profile page. Manage Profile)
Definitely a better album than Momentary Lapse, however I tend to think (going strictly by this site’s current album score (74/100) and track average (82/100)) the album score is a little more accurate and the song scores are pretty gassed up.
The Division Bell is a fine album with some pretty notable highs. But there’s some stuff that plays like filler and a couple of pretty dated sounds too. Gilmour’s tone and solos single-handedly lift a couple of these tracks out of mediocrity.
Overall though, the writing and sonics of the album are pretty sound, the first leg of the album is great and Gilmour’s presence is much stronger here than on the band’s previous record.
I think this album is underrated because of the absence of Roger Waters. It's not quite as good as the albums from the 70s but it comes close in a couple ways. Give it a listen and decide for yourself!
Pretty moody and mellow. The guitar work is spectacular. Seemingly many snide allusions to departed member Roger Waters casts a cynical, downbeat tone to the lyrics.
There's no denying that this doesn't sound as much like vintage Pink Floyd as a David Gilmour solo record. That's not to detract from Richard Wright and Nick Mason's performances, it's just that Gilmour's prints are all over this. That's not necessarily a bad thing, however, and The Division Bell stands out as one of Pink Floyd's most convincing records. There's ambience (Cluster One and Marooned), the classic Floyd sound (What Do You Want From Me) and a soaring epic (High Hopes), all alongside some great guitar work and powerful vocals. This will never be Pink Floyd's most well-regarded album but if you can listen openly, you might just like what you hear.
Even though Roger Waters wasn't part of this, the album, as a whole, is up there in the top tier of best Pink Floyd music. There are many good songs on it, but "Coming Back To Life" is a perfect creation.
A rare album where the second half is better than the first half. The album is a little bit too long, there are a few 6-minute duds. High Hopes is a great closer and the best song on the album. Also like Take It Back and Wearing the Inside Out.
One of my personal underrated PF albums. Even though this is post Roger Waters era, I find the instrumentals make up for the lack of vocals. Gilmore proves on this album why he is one of the best guitarists of the last century, even without water. The album was just very peaceful to listen to, and in my opinion their most brilliant album since the wall. TDB was able to show the new found creativity that Gilmore and Wright were able show being in control without waters.
It's good but definitely not top tier Floyd. I've heard at least two people that said this was their favorite Pink Floyd album, I was confused why but you can like what you want, that's the beauty of music. Nothing Earth shattering but it is nice.
A good album, but the lyrical quality is lessened by a lack of Roger Waters
The comparison to the previous albums by Pink Floyd is rather harsh.
The songwriting is below average (for Pink Floyd standards), but the music is just fine.
Your feedback for The Division Bell
A lot of hard work happens in the background to keep BEA running, and it's especially difficult to do this when we can't pay our hosting fees :(
We work very hard to ensure our site is as fast (and FREE!) as possible, and we respect your privacy.