Tommy
by The Who

Tommy by The Who
Year: 1969
Release date: 1969-05-23
Overall rank: 240th   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
81/100 (from 1,483 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top 20 albums of 1969 (11th)
Award Top 50 albums of of the 1960s (39th)
Award Top 500 albums of all time (240th)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.
eBay
Sorry, no matches on eBay for "Tommy The Who".

  My favourite store:  

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

The Who bestography

Tommy is ranked 3rd best out of 51 albums by The Who on BestEverAlbums.com.

The best album by The Who is Who's Next which is ranked number 40 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 20,242.

The Who album bestography « Higher ranked (224th)
Quadrophenia
This album (240th)
Tommy
Lower ranked (512th) »
The Who Sell Out

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to Tommy on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

Tommy track list

  Track ratings The tracks on this album have an average rating of 81 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).

Sort Sort by
#
Track
Rating/Comments
13.
Track pick (900 - 447 votes)
Average Rating: 90 (447 votes)Comments: View 6
15.
Track pick (870 - 246 votes)
Average Rating: 87 (246 votes)Comments: View 2
24.
Track pick (860 - 267 votes)
Average Rating: 86 (267 votes)Comments: View 2

Track pick (1000 - 100 votes) Top-rated track as rated by BestEverAlbums.com members.

Tommy rankings

Tommy rankings summary
Overall rank: 240th | 1960s rank: 39th | 1969 rank: 11th  Overall chart history
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings).Help Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 2 hours ago)

Tommy collection

Tommy ratings

Average Rating: 
81/100 (from 1,483 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this album.  | Show all 1,483 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
80/100
 !
1 hour ago Siromynian  Ratings distribution  1,67278/100
 
60/100
 !
15 hours ago luukvdschepop  Ratings distribution  76775/100
 
75/100
 !
3 days ago dsavard  Ratings distribution  68077/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album is rated in the top 1% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 80.7/100, a mean average of 79.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 80.8/100. The standard deviation for this album is 15.5.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

Tommy favourites

Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite  | Show all 302 members

Tommy forum mentions

This album has been referenced 111 times on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“Today's chart of the day My Overall Chart: 101-200 by Romanelli () 1. by (1969) 2. by (1997) 3. by (1992) 5. by (1993) 6. by (1985) 7. by (2007) 8. by (1992) 9. by (1998) 10. (1966) 11. by (2007) 12. (1987) 13. by (1970) 14. by (1968) 15. by (1997) 16. by (1993) 17. by (1996) 19. by (1991) 20. by…”
View forum post →

“Today's chart of the day Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by Deckiller () 1. by by (2015) 3. by (2002) 4. by (1969) 5. by (1969) 6. by by (1992) 8. by by by (1970) 11. by by (1986) 13. by (1981) 15. (1977) 17. by (1986) 18. by (2013) 20. (1969) 21. by (1972) 22. by (1973) 23. by (1971) 24. by by…”
View forum post →

“Today's chart of the day Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by ) 1. by (1965) 2. by (1969) 3. by (1973) 4. by by (1971) 6. by (1970) 7. by (1959) 8. by by (1976) 10. by (1970) 11. by by (1984) 14. (1971) 15. by (1958) 16. by (1998) 17. by (1969) 18. by (2024) 19. by (1997) 20. by (1965) 21. by by (2014)…”
View forum post →

View all forum mentions

Tommy comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 83 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
The opera-rock label has made this album huge in the past but makes people lift up an eyebrow today.
It was ambitious and stepforward when it came out but to judge it for what it was THEN is just as unfair as judge it from the POV of "hey other people made more coherent rock opera after that" as if all that matters about an album would be some sort of plot.
I like to judge it for the music itself. How it sounds today and how it sounds in the context of what was being made at that time. And I find this to be a hell of a good album.
Who's next and Quadrophenia could arguably be better in performance and sound but here we got superb riffs, a very powerful backsection and Roger Daltrey finally finding his voice as a frontman and singer. A lot of subtle electronica and imaginative use of studio possibilities too (just listen to "amazing journey" for example).
As with any double album there are some fillers, interludes and songs that are not up there with the best ones. Anyway it works very well in one sitting.

Overall an outstanding record. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 6
Rating:  
40/100
Tommy sounds extremely dated, not to mention it plays to zero of The Who's strengths, save a track here and there. The last thing I want to hear from The Who is a rock opera. I want some hard rocking bangers! Not a fucking song about Christmas! Like what the hell were they even thinking? Pete Townshend must have had the biggest ego in the world if he thought he could pull this off. And everyone seems to have fed his ego back in the day, with stage adaptations coming out every other second. To be fair, a lot of the music is fine, but it's definitely taking a backseat to the story. Which is definitely the least interesting aspect of this album. Time has not been kind to this album. Oh well, at least they influenced other bands to attempt the same thing. Gotta give it up for Pinball Wizard though, song kicks some serious ass. Unfortunately, every single other track I could easily skip and not lose a wink of sleep.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 4
Rating:  
100/100
Not only does it succeed as a rock opera, but the majority of the songs on the album stand quite well on their own and do not necessarily have to be taken in context to be appreciated. Pete's finest hour as a songwriter.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Rating:  
85/100
It's so cool when an entire album is dedicated to telling one cohesive story. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 7
Rating:  
90/100
This album was a revelation when I first heard it and I still find it compelling today. Pet proves he's more than just a rocker right from the get-go by writing a magnificent overture. Interestingly, I find the one big hit, Pinball Wizard, a bit overrated and definitely overplayed. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 4
Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Join the conversation!.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.