Oasis 
The best album credited to Oasis is (What's The Story) Morning Glory? which is ranked number 57 in the overall greatest album chart with a total rank score of 16,765.
Oasis is ranked number 50 in the overall artist rankings with a total rank score of 31,930.
Oasis official website: http://www.myspace.com/oasis
- Members: N.B. The member list may not contain a full list of members (and there may be notable omissions). If a member has never released a solo album, or their solo albums do not appear on BEA, they will not be able to be listed as a member. These omissions are not meant to cause offense to anybody. The member list is solely meant as an additional navigation aid to browse between the items listed on the site.
- Noel Gallagher
- Liam Gallagher
- Andy Bell
Listen & Collect
Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.
Listen to Oasis on YouTube
Oasis best albums
The following albums by Oasis are ranked highest in the greatest album charts:
Oasis bestography composition
Oasis best tracks
Include tracks from compilations & live albums | Exclude tracks from compilations & live albums The same track can appear on multiple albums, so excluding tracks from compilations and live albums helps to remove duplicates from this list.
Oasis ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 3 ratings for this artist. | Show all 331 ratings for this artist.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Artist ratings | Avg. artist rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 09/24/2026 11:13 | ornot27 | 10 | 87/100 |
| ! | 08/07/2026 11:20 | 32 | 81/100 | |
| ! | 06/05/2026 10:49 | kinginsomniac12 | 77 | 100/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some artists can have several thousand ratings)
This artist has a Bayesian average rating of 71.2/100, a mean average of 71.1/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 71.1/100. The standard deviation for this artist is 26.5.
Oasis favourites
Showing latest 10 members who have added this artist as a favourite | Show all 95 members
Oasis forum mentions
View latest topic →
Oasis comments
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
I don't think they were even close to be the best band of the 90s. One of the biggest and most popular, sure. But not the best. For me, Morning glory is their only truly great album. The rest goes from pretty good to incredibly mediocre, in my opinion. But hey, they were never unlistenable, and let's be fair here, one great album is more than lots of bands achieve in a lifetime.
Oasis is one of those bands that people love to hate. They came onto the scene when the grunge movement was coming to halt. Oasis started off their career with an amazing debut, one of the best all time. They followed it up with another album considered even better than their debut. They produced some pretty great songs lyrically and musically on those two albums, and the albums as a whole felt complete. After those first two albums, they still made some decent songs, but none of their albums truly compared to the first two. Tension between the Gallagher brothers caused their downfall. They had a lot of potential, but ultimately could not deliver the same consistent level of quality.
Would I say they were the best band of the Manchester-Britpop era? Absolutely.
Would I say they were a Top 10 nineties band? Probably.
Would I say they were the best band since The Beatles? Definitely not, not even close.
It's a shame they couldn't put together any truly amazing albums after their first two.
Oasis were always sold to Brits as the next Beatles and always sold to Americans as an alternative to grunge. But really they were just a derivative, mediocre band devoid of creativity with a whiny front man who acted like he was God's gift despite not even being able to sing his way out of a wet paper sack, consistently awful and embarrassingly empty lyrics and song compositions so basic as to place them beneath your average high school garage band.
Oasis is not any better than one of those third tier U.S. grunge bands that popped up in the 90s hoping to ride the Nirvana wave. They are also no better than the majority of 80s hair metal acts people like to make fun of these days. The fact they are ranked above clearly far superior bands like Queen, Pearl Jam, The Cure, Black Sabbath and scores of others on here is simply laughable.
Pompous pricks who produced 2 reasonably fun albums, both of which are extremely derivative, and therefore not worthy of 15th place - top 100 at best.
It DEEPLY saddens me this band is so highly rated. I think maybe it was a UK craze? I mean don't get me wrong, they had some good hits and all, but I put them on the same level as like Third Eye Blind... NOT, I repeat NOT Miles Davis or R.E.M.

