Headquarters
by The Monkees

Headquarters by The Monkees
Year: 1967
Release date: 1967-05-22
Overall rank: 4,142nd   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
73/100 (from 137 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top albums of 1967 (50th)
Award Top albums of of the 1960s (340th)
Award Best albums of all time (4,142nd)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.
eBay
Sorry, no matches on eBay for "Headquarters The Monkees".

  My favourite store:  

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

The Monkees bestography

Headquarters is ranked 2nd best out of 23 albums by The Monkees on BestEverAlbums.com.

The best album by The Monkees is The Monkees which is ranked number 3930 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 376.

The Monkees album bestography « Higher ranked (3,930th)
The Monkees
This album (4,142nd)
Headquarters
Lower ranked (4,580th) »
Pisces, Aquarius, Capricorn & Jones Ltd.

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to Headquarters on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

Headquarters track list

  Track ratings The tracks on this album have an average rating of 78 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).

Sort Sort by

Headquarters rankings

Headquarters rankings summary
Overall rank: 4,142nd | 1960s rank: 340th | 1967 rank: 50th  Overall chart history
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings).Help Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 4 hours ago)

Headquarters collection

Headquarters ratings

Average Rating: 
73/100 (from 137 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this album.  | Show all 137 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
70/100
 !
08/24/2026 02:11 BurndenAce  Ratings distribution  1,33476/100
 
65/100
 !
02/07/2026 13:14 cicadelic  Ratings distribution  14,08773/100
 
80/100
 !
01/15/2026 18:44 LittleM1971  Ratings distribution  6,00981/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album is rated in the top 25% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 73.4/100, a mean average of 72.7/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 73.5/100. The standard deviation for this album is 15.2.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

Headquarters favourites

Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite  | Show all 18 members

Headquarters forum mentions

This album has been referenced 22 times on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“What album are you listening to? (cont.)”
View forum post →

“What album are you listening to right now?”
View forum topic (19 mentions) →

“Anyway, I digress... well really excited to talk about anything than my next record: 1. This had music in it. It was in the right key. And it had interesting arrangments... that were all flat and boring as hell. 2/60 for sure on this sucker. I nearly didn't finish it but decided to do so out of the…”
View forum post →

View all forum mentions

Headquarters comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 7 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
Rating:  
90/100
The people who dismiss the Monkees without ever having listened to them, and who refer to them derisively as a "band" (never without quotation marks), can never really be convinced of their merits. I don't have ill feelings toward these people because they had the whole media telling a story about the Monkees that wasn't really true.

I'm gonna skip over the music for a minute and talk about the relationship between the band and the label/company. Somebody commented on here that the Monkees represented the end of musical integrity and the triumph of the love of money. The thing is, if the Monkees are not important for their music, they are important for being a group, perhaps the first, that stood up AGAINST this paradigm. The Monkees came around in the mid-to-late 60s. What do you think was going on before this? I'll tell you-- companies were putting together groups of men or women who could sing, and then they were choosing songs written by professional songwriters under contract, and they were recording those songs in the studio with session musicians. That's just the way it was done (with a few exceptions). It was rare that any groups would play their own instruments either on record or on stage. That's how the corporations liked it--Total Control. If it sounds familiar, it's because that's how the Monkees started out. Yes, they were prefabricated. Nobody's going to deny that. But, they because an extremely important band because they broke the mold. Somehow, they and a couple of allies they had in the company, waged a war in order to control their own musical destiny. They shouldn't be denigrated for having started out just the same as so many other groups; they should be celebrated for showing the music world that artists are not puppets to be controlled by corporations. They have to have free will.

As for the album Headquarters, they played every note, and it turns out they were talented guys. Does the album stand up with the greats? Well, no, but it is one of the better albums of the year. Moreover, it is better than just about any other talented band at the time that were playing their own instruments and writing their own songs. Much of this is due to the prodigious talents of Michael Nesmith, who's song "You Just May Be the One" is an extraordinary study in pop hooks, and is the best tune on the albums. His other songs, along with Micky's "Randy Scouse Git" are the album's other best songs. The album is weakest when it is borrowing corporate tunes, written for money, like those by Boyce and Hart, and Mann and Weil. Like most of the songs on the first two Monkees albums, these songs lack heart. Nesmith's were always the best because he was an artist recording his own tunes. So many of the songs that Don Kirshner selected were so flat because they were written for a paycheck. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
well.....this is one of the most notorious "bands" in history, and many hate them justifiably as an example of what we let happen to ourselves once music got too big and the money too easy to print. this is the fiction story about the beatles. that they were cute and not very talented, that they could be xeroxed continuously for profit until the machine broke. the real story is more interesting. and some of the music is very good. some is god awful. here they were in '67, though, not in charge of anything, but if you listen to the tracks you have to admit they were not trying to get rich or be "mainstream" pop stars. michael nesmith could really write and play, and his discomfort within the group gave it much-needed tension. and they experimented in a mainstream way with vinyl that was precious, and they didn't give a shit.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Rating:  
80/100
From 05/30/2016 19:09 | #167319 | TOP COMMENT Help Vote up your preferred comments and the comments with the most votes will be flagged.
A lot of my favourite Monkeestracks are the ones sung by Michael Nesmith and this has some of his best, You Told Me, You Just May Be The One. For Pete's Sake is another cracker, as is No Time. Second only to Head as an album for me.....
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Rating:  
75/100
Better than I might have expected, downright interesting at times and remarkable given the context. Not exactly the Beatles, but less far away than I would have guessed.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Rating:  
80/100
Headquarters (2007 Remaster) (1967) by The Monkees - 7.16666666667/10 (Rating Doesn’t Include Tracks that aren’t songs) - Listened to on 7/4/2019
A1 - You Told Me - 7/10
A2 - I'll Spend My Life With You - 7/10
A3 - Forget That Girl - 7/10
A4 - Band 6 - 6/10 (Not Song)
A5 - You Just May Be the One - 8/10
A6 - Shades of Gray - 9/10
A7 - I Can't Get Her Off My Mind - 9/10
B1 - For Pete's Sake - 6/10
B2 - Mr. Webster - 6/10
B3 - Sunny Girlfriend - 6/10
B4 - Zilch - 6/10 (Not Song)
B5 - No Time - 7/10
B6 - Early Morning Blues and Greens - 6/10
B7 - Randy Scouse Git - 8/10
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Join the conversation!.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.