White Light/White Heat
by The Velvet Underground

White Light/White Heat by The Velvet Underground
Year: 1968
Release date: 1968-01-30
Overall rank: 166th   Overall chart history
Average Rating: 
84/100 (from 1,428 votes)
  Ratings distribution   Average rating history
Accolades:
Award Top 10 albums of 1968 (7th)
Award Top 50 albums of of the 1960s (30th)
Award Top 200 albums of all time (166th)

Listen on Spotify SPOTIFY

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.
eBay
Sorry, no matches on eBay for "heat The Velvet Underground".

  My favourite store:  

Listen & Collect

Complete your collection or upgrade your listening experience.

The Velvet Underground bestography

White Light/White Heat is ranked 3rd best out of 19 albums by The Velvet Underground on BestEverAlbums.com.

The best album by The Velvet Underground is The Velvet Underground & Nico which is ranked number 10 in the list of all-time albums with a total rank score of 37,103.

The Velvet Underground album bestography « Higher ranked (95th)
The Velvet Underground
This album (166th)
White Light/White Heat
Lower ranked (269th) »
Loaded

(N.B. Bestographies include all albums by an artist (and their variations), but do not include albums ranked outside the top 100,000).

Listen to White Light/White Heat on YouTube

Loading content from YouTube...

White Light/White Heat track list

  Track ratings The tracks on this album have an average rating of 86 out of 100 (all tracks have been rated).

Sort Sort by
#
Track
Rating/Comments
1.
Track pick (880 - 423 votes)
Average Rating: 88 (423 votes)Comments: View 2
3.
Track pick (860 - 351 votes)
Average Rating: 86 (351 votes)Comments: View 5
6.
Track pick (890 - 424 votes)
Average Rating: 89 (424 votes)Comments: View 14

Track pick (1000 - 100 votes) Top-rated track as rated by BestEverAlbums.com members.

White Light/White Heat rankings

White Light/White Heat rankings summary
Overall rank: 166th | 1960s rank: 30th | 1968 rank: 7th  Overall chart history
Calculated from aggregate positions across 60,000 charts (2 million album rankings).Help Click to see how the rankings are calculated (Last updated: 2 hours ago)

White Light/White Heat collection

White Light/White Heat ratings

Average Rating: 
84/100 (from 1,428 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this album.  | Show all 1,428 ratings for this album.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberAlbum ratingsAvg. album rating
 
85/100
 !
09/29/2026 10:28 Siromynian  Ratings distribution  1,78974/100
 
70/100
 !
09/20/2026 17:10 AledJames  Ratings distribution  1,72069/100
 
60/100
 !
09/15/2026 10:59 TheWongs  Ratings distribution  88971/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some albums can have several thousand ratings)

This album is rated in the top 1% of all albums on BestEverAlbums.com. This album has a Bayesian average rating of 83.5/100, a mean average of 82.4/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 83.6/100. The standard deviation for this album is 15.4.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

White Light/White Heat favourites

Showing latest 10 members who have added this album as a favourite  | Show all 254 members

White Light/White Heat forum mentions

This album has been referenced 103 times on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“Today's chart of the day Top 100 Greatest Music Albums by Untitled () 1. (1989) 2. by (1979) 3. by (1998) 4. by by (1996) 6. by (2000) 7. (2005) 8. by (1994) 9. by (1975) 10. by (1985) 11. (1991) 12. (1966) 13. (2001) 14. by (1959) 15. by (1999) 16. by (1965) 17. (2008) 18. by (1966) 19. (1977) 20.…”
(8 mentions across Chart of the Day topics)
View latest topic →

“What album are you listening to? (cont.)”
View topic (4 mentions) →

“Today's album of the day White Light/White Heat by The Velvet Underground ( | ) Year: 1968. Country: Overall rank: 163 Decade rank: 29 Year rank: 7 Discography rank: 3 (out of 18 albums on BEA) Average rating: 84/100 (from 1419 votes). Tracks: 1. White Light/White Heat 2. The Gift 3. Lady Godiva's…”
(6 mentions across Album of the Day topics)
View latest topic →

View all forum mentions

White Light/White Heat comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 102 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
Rating:  
70/100
Drugged out album which involves nearly zero songwriting, the sound of a band that doesn't give a fuck! I can't see its experimental nature, all The Velvet Underground ever did on this record was to turn up the volume and allow the created feed-back and noise to be maintained in the mix. The poem on "The Gift" sounds goofy, most songs consist of monotonous rhythm patterns and the variety on this album is minimal.

I get that most people see this as a groundbreaking wall of noise, but I think the band were lacking discipline in the creating of the album to make it anywhere near great. Besides the opener, which works fine as opener but nothing more, and the idea of a long track to end the album, this album is nothing but free play!

I wasn't looking for a pleasant pop-album, but even from an avant-garde music lover's point of view, I wouldn't be able to see the greatness from this album. After all it isn't very experimental, it's only a pumping rhythm section that never stops, where each member play whatever they want to. We've already seen this from free-form jazz!

So why is this album ranked and rated so high? My guess is because of The Velvet Underground's completely exaggerated image. It's not because I'm scared of the album's dissonant and unstructured composition, but this band's discography and especially this album is like a complex joke: If you don't get it, you're probably just stupid. Hurry up laughing, or someone else will notice! (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 16
Log in to reply
Rating:  
70/100
It does have little songwriting (as I said it has nearly, but only nearly, zero songwriting), but the songwriting itself is nothing to get excited about at all!

The thoughts behind the album itself are very limited, I don't think anybody will disagree with that statement, and the result of this album is something that reflects a most likely chaotic lifestyle and a band completely out of control. Out of madness comes genius or what? Is that really the case with this album? Or has its praise something to do with the fact that this might be the first album where drugs had completely drawn a band away from the music? This album is different, yes, but only because of its noisier sound and masturbating drive. Something that arguably have inspired many bands, okay, but WHY IS IT GREAT? After all it is in our top 200 OF ALL TIME! Not very far from our top 100 when you think about it!

Sorry if I seem mad, I know this comment will get a lot of negative votes. But I really have a suspicion that people are bandwagoning with this album, a case where the image is bigger than the music. It just frustrates me that so many bands and artists have put really much thought and energy into an album to perfect it and make it really great, and then there is this band who just hurries into a studio (I've read on Wikipedia that the album was recorded in two days) and make this soulless piece of nonsense!
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 9
Log in to reply
Rating:  
95/100
F*cking amazing noise. Every track sounds great, from The Gift's droning voice-over to Sister Ray's noisy, long jams to Lady Godiva's Operation's perfect vocal and guitar union. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 10
Log in to reply
From 09/16/2016 14:26 | #175113 | TOP COMMENT Help Vote up your preferred comments and the comments with the most votes will be flagged.
This conclusion was really difficult for me to come to. I decided this past week to explore the Velvet Underground discography beyond their debut album, which I love. I read all about the record before listening to, as I typically do, to understand the context of how it was created and the increase in creative liberty seemed like a positive to me (in the absence of Warhol).

That being said, I found myself disappointing by this record. In one sense the shorter tracks are more of what I liked from their debut, albeit without the strophic song structure that I felt worked for the band. The track "The Gift" was very tense and something that I authentically enjoyed listening to. The record seemed more tonically tense and harsher to listen to, which I am not adverse to in music. I love groups like the Drones and Godspeed You Black Emperor. These compositions, while I saw what they were going for, felt more edgy and sad due to the potential of unrealized ideas than anything.

What killed my opinion of this record was my inability to enjoy the track "Sister Ray", which unfortunately makes up almost half the record. As someone who enjoys long-form music, specifically classical influences in rock music, I found myself utterly bored with this song. The harsh, distorted sound never GOES anywhere, and there doesn't seem to be any meaningful development.

I won't be keeping this record in my library. It has some nice moments, and some great ideas, but the cons are too uncompromising for me to enjoy it further.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Log in to reply
Rating:  
95/100
From 01/14/2022 23:45 | #279398 | TOP COMMENT Help Vote up your preferred comments and the comments with the most votes will be flagged.
This is probably the groups least accessible album by a long way but it is also their most experimental and interesting album to explore both sonically and lyrically. The guitars are allowed to pretty much just run free on this album and we are really rewarded for them doing that. We get that classic VU screeching guitar noise all over this record and there are times when they are fighting over which one can play louder which makes for some incredible moments on Sister Ray. The lyrics are amazing and so diverse and every time I listen to this record I am stunned by the genius and engaging lyrics that Reed gave us. They are delivered brilliantly by him as well. Every track is great and has its moments to shine and each cut is completely unique and the variety we are treated to is amazing. Instrumentally, I think they are at the strongest on this record and also on The Velvet Underground And Nico as demonstrated best on Sister Ray which is up there with one of their best ever tracks. Overall, an absolute classic from VU and while on first listen it may seem a little abrasive, once you have given it a few more tries you will fall in love with this album just like I have. (Edited)
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 5
Log in to reply
Anonymous
What do you think of this album? Join the conversation!.
The top-voted comments get featured on our charts, Album of the Day, and the site newsletter.

Log in or create an account to rate this album, leave comments or join the discussion.