100 Best Albums of the 2000s
by Rolling Stone (2011) 
Rolling Stone is an American monthly magazine that focuses on music, politics, and popular culture. It was founded in San Francisco, California. These are their best albums of 2000s.
(Official website: https://www.rollingstone.com | Original URL Warning: The address at the original source was valid at the time the chart was added, but may have changed afterwards. )
Safe Mode: On Certain images on this site may contain sensitive content and are flagged as 'unsafe'. BestEverAlbums.com does not display these images by default, but you may choose to show or hide these images from your profile page. If you choose to hide these images, you'll see an image with a warning message instead of the actual image. If you choose to show them, you'll see these images no differently than regular (safe) images.
100 Best Albums of the 2000s composition
| Year | Albums | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 13 | 13% | |
| 2001 | 14 | 14% | |
| 2002 | 14 | 14% | |
| 2003 | 11 | 11% | |
| 2004 | 11 | 11% | |
| 2005 | 8 | 8% | |
| 2006 | 8 | 8% | |
| 2007 | 10 | 10% | |
| 2008 | 8 | 8% | |
| 2009 | 2 | 2% |
| Artist | Albums | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
| Kanye West | 4 | 4% | |
| Radiohead | 4 | 4% | |
| Coldplay | 3 | 3% | |
| Kings Of Leon | 3 | 3% | |
| U2 | 3 | 3% | |
| Arcade Fire | 2 | 2% | |
| TV On The Radio | 2 | 2% | |
| Show all | |||
| Country | Albums | % | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|||
|
68 | 68% | |
|
13 | 13% | |
|
4 | 4% | |
|
4 | 4% | |
|
3 | 3% | |
|
3 | 3% | |
|
3 | 3% | |
| Show all | |||
100 Best Albums of the 2000s similar charts
| Title | Source | Type | Published | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rolling Stone 100 Best Albums of the 2000s | WayneMC | Custom chart | 2020 | ![]() |
| Die 100 besten Alben der 2000er Jahre | Popkultur.de | 2000s decade chart | 2021 | ![]() |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | nas062080 | 2000s decade chart | 2013 | ![]() |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | 2000s decade chart | 2015 | ![]() | |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | 2000s decade chart | 2026 | ![]() | |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | 2000s decade chart | 2020 | ![]() | |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | 2000s decade chart | 2014 | ![]() | |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | mjbreuer | 2000s decade chart | 2016 | ![]() |
| Los 100 mejores discos de la década | Diariocrítico | 2000s decade chart | 2009 | ![]() |
| Top 100 Music Albums of the 2000s | daCritic | 2000s decade chart | 2024 | ![]() |
100 Best Albums of the 2000s similarity to your chart(s)
Not a member? Creating an account is quick, easy and FREE!
Join 50,000+ music fans
- Join a community of over 50,000 music fans.
- Create & share your own charts.
- Influence the overall album rankings.
- Post comments in the forums and vote on polls.
- Comment on or rate any album, artist, track or chart.
- Discover new music & improve your music collection.
- Customise the overall chart using a variety of different filters & metrics.
- Create a wishlist of albums.
- Unlock Dark Mode and other member features.
- Help maintain the BEA database.
- Earn member points and gain access to increasing levels of functionality!
- And much more.
Join now It only takes a moment.
Other 2000s decade charts
| Title | Source | Type | Published | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Best Albums of the 2000s | Rolling Stone | 2000s decade chart | 2011 | ![]() |
| The Top 200 Albums of the 2000s | Pitchfork | 2000s decade chart | 2009 | ![]() |
| Top 100 Greatest Albums of the 2000s | New Music Express | 2000s decade chart | 2009 | ![]() |
Other charts by Rolling Stone
| Title | Source | Type | Published | Country |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 100 Best Albums of the 2010s | Rolling Stone | 2010s decade chart | 2019 | ![]() |
| 100 Best Albums of the 2000s | Rolling Stone | 2000s decade chart | 2011 | ![]() |
| 100 Best Albums of the Nineties | Rolling Stone | 1990s decade chart | 2010 | ![]() |
100 Best Albums of the 2000s ratings
Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AVwhere:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.
Showing latest 3 ratings for this chart. | Show all 177 ratings for this chart.
| Rating | Date updated | Member | Chart ratings | Avg. chart rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ! | 10/29/2024 10:10 | tk421ucopy | 55 | 85/100 |
| ! | 11/11/2020 13:03 | 1,139 | 86/100 | |
| ! | 10/29/2020 16:26 | Tony58 | 39 | 77/100 |
Rating metrics:
Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some charts can have several thousand ratings)
This chart has a Bayesian average rating of 69.4/100, a mean average of 68.0/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 68.6/100. The standard deviation for this chart is 22.8.
100 Best Albums of the 2000s favourites
Showing all 4 members who have added this chart as a favourite
100 Best Albums of the 2000s forum mentions
100 Best Albums of the 2000s comments
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
Well, generally not a bad chart, but for me to much repetitions. I can understand that Radiohead has to appear not only once, but to list every album of Bob Dylan, Jay-Z, Kanye West and Bruce Springsteen is a little bit too much for me. That makes the list look like chart of a fan and not of journalists. And please: Sufjan Stevens Illinois on 78?? Come on, guys! I am a big Sufjan fan, but serious: from the musical point of view (instrumentation, melodies, arragement) it is worse than 77 other albums in the 2000s? Objectively speeking. Worse than Stadium Arcadium???
Just as bad as the 90s chart. The top 10 isn't too bad but like the 90's chart there's just as many baffling choices. All That You Can't Leave Behind and The Rising (I even really like the Rising, too) in the top 15? Amnesiac over In Rainbows? Tha Carter III is in the top 40 (hell, it shouldn't even be here)? No Line on The Horizon, considered by many to be the worst U2 album, is on the list? Illinois and For Emma, Forever Ago aren't even in the top half of the list? Stadium Arcadium is on the list? This is the same the RHCP album that had two big singles and a bunch of "meh" songs, right? Again, some good choices here, but most of them are overshadow by some absolutely maddening ones.
Here's a list of great albums that Rolling Stone put behind "Tha Carter III" by Lil Wayne that should NOT be behind "Tha Carter III" by Lil Wayne:
. Discovery (Daft Punk)
. Stories From The City, Stories From The Sea (P.J. Harvey)
. Late Registration (Kanye West)
. Whatever People Say I Am, That's What I'm Not (Arctic Monkeys)
. Toxicity (System Of A Down)
. Parachutes (Coldplay)
. Illinois (Sufjan Stevens)
They put ILLINOIS by Sufjan Stevens behind Tha Carter III by Lil Wayne! That alone is enough to bring this list down. Also, Ágætis Byrjun by Sigur Rós was released in 1999... why is it on this list?
Only Rolling Stone would put a modern day Dylan album that high.
It's not a bad list, but first of all, these guys need to stop obsessing over Bob Dylan, and second of all, is it really fair to say that Oracular Spectacular and a lot of other albums are better than In Rainbows? Really?






