Top 100 Greatest Music Albums
by RawlsRE

There are 13 comments for this chart from BestEverAlbums.com members and Top 100 Greatest Music Albums has an average rating of 88 out of 100 (from 13 votes). Please log in or create an account to leave a comment or assign a rating.

Log in or create an account to rate this chart, leave comments or join the discussion.
The entries in this chart have a zero rank score because the chart has not been updated within the last ten years (points from overall charts are decayed over a ten year period).
Share this chart
Collector's summary Help The maximum rank used by the Collector's Summary is configurable from your profile (top 100 is currently selected). Log in or create an account to discover the great albums that are missing from your music collection!
Sort Sort by
Outside is a bloated, inscrutable concept album about art at war with culture. But that's hardly surprising - all of Bowie's albums are about that. It's also a jazz-industrial hybrid. That's new for him, though we saw precursors to it in West Berlin. The commercial release of Outside is quite a bit glossier than was originally intended. This is because the label didn't think the initial iteration, which was something of a jam album with Campbell, Eno, Gabrels, Garson, and Kizilcay, was saleable. You can find a good chunk of it by googling 'outside outtakes.' While the outtakes are great (their inaccessibility is exaggerated), I like this album for its studio sophistication, so I'm kind of happy the label bigwigs got cold feet.

I put this question to my girlfriend: "how can I persuade people that Outside warrants the praise that I give it?" I have no idea how to answer this question myself. Outside's value was immediately clear to me from my first listen. My opinion of it hasn't changed at all over the past decade. In fact, I use it as a kind of yardstick for my own music. It represents my ideal of sonic design. Whenever I work with another musician, I show them Outside to give them a sense of that I'm striving for. And by what must be an extremely implausible coincidence, they always see (or at any rate, they claim to see) its merit. And yet, the majority of those who have heard it don't think it's remarkable. I find this bewildering.

My girlfriend had three answers to my question. First, its production. Second, its sonic depth. And finally, caustic Bowie. The first two are clear enough, so I'll expand on this last one - most people like hedonistic Bowie (as seen on Ziggy) and vacant Bowie (as seen on Low), but I prefer the Bowie that hams it up in pantomime of music culture. Caustic Bowie is most prevalent on Outside and Scary Monsters. On Scary Monsters, Bowie invokes his caustic self in order to ridicule his own career. On outside, caustic Bowie is employed as a best guess at what millennial music would sound like. He represents it as a grotesque of empty affect, unreflecting sarcasm, and inhuman jazz croon. Yes, he was wrong - (unfortunately) the aughts sound nothing like this. Still, it's an amusing picture.

Garson is given the opportunity to indulge in his sprawling piano style throughout. I like the Bacchic mess of it. You also get the best of Gabrel's intensely-detailed guitar production. But the highlight is the studio-as-instrument songwriting. The whirring gizmos, the regurgitated vocal effects, the bubbling second bassline, and the one-off feedback washes of 'Heart's Filthy Lesson' (plus Garson's sunny chords at the end). The sinister little sirens, the jazz pastiche, the slow fade-in on the gnashing drums of 'A Small Plot of Land' (this is my favourite from the album - the drum, piano, vocal and guitar performances are excellent). The chainsaw riff and the slow-motion dripping pitch guitar of 'Hallo Spaceboy.' The manufactured jazz lounge, the ghostly whimpers and the swollen guitar note at the end of 'The Motel.' The filter modulation on the percussion, the panned sirens, Alomar's bright strumming and Gabrels' sober guitar-synth of 'No Control.' The pitched snares of 'I am with Name.' The turning signal sound, and the pitched laughter all throughout 'Wishful Beginnings.' The synth chirps and goofy drum machine woodblock of 'We Prick You.' The propulsive squeaks, the hopelessly indulgent strings, and the panned 'ye-ES's of 'I'm Deranged' (along with Bowie's opiated vocals and Garson's solo, thick with false romance). The mass of guitar overdubs on 'Thru these Architect's Eyes.' The 'sky saw' on 'Strangers when we Meet.' It's an impressive level of detail.
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1995
Appears in:
Rank Score:
698
Rank in 1995:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
2. (=)
[First added to this chart: 11/14/2013]
Year of Release:
2000
Appears in:
Rank Score:
38,547
Rank in 2000:
Rank in 2000s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Top rated album (89/100 - 4513 votes)  89 (4,513 votes)
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1974
Appears in:
Rank Score:
6,368
Rank in 1974:
Rank in 1970s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1994
Appears in:
Rank Score:
8,822
Rank in 1994:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1999
Appears in:
Rank Score:
2,496
Rank in 1999:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
2003
Appears in:
Rank Score:
8,013
Rank in 2003:
Rank in 2000s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 02/10/2014]
Year of Release:
1990
Appears in:
Rank Score:
305
Rank in 1990:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
It's easy enough to love OK Computer, but it seems to me that the key to WORSHIPING it is No Surprises. That song is a paradigmatic example of the Radiohead formula: an ambiguous compromise of quasi-pastiche/snarling-sarcasm-just-beneath-the-surface with a deep and oddly genuine sympathy for our banal and inconsequential little lives. And yet I can't help finding the song boring. The cloying xylophone, Yorke's deadpan delivery, the surgically clean guitar tones, the fact that it is in many ways an iteration of Fake Plastic Trees - it all contributes to four minutes that I experience as four minutes, rather than as the revelation that everyone else seems to hear. Of course, even beyond that the album isn't perfect. Fitter Happier just isn't good, and Climbing up the Walls lacks the sophistication of the rest of the material. Still, you can't deny that OK Computer's guitar work is among the best available. This is also the album where Radiohead arrived at their ability (in many ways unique to them) to capture the full complexity and ineffability of their chosen themes using the conventions of popular music. Of course, many of those conventions are perverted along the way, but quite a lot are preserved as well, or they are on this album at any rate. Evidently, this is what critics were responding to when they heralded Radiohead as the saviours of rock and roll. I'm not certain rock and roll needed rescue, but that's unimportant. What's important is the tremolo on Airbag, the lazy surrendering to the drudgery of the world of Let Down and the Tourist, the remarkably effective mellotron atmospheres appearing throughout the album that seem to revel in their own artificiality, and on and on. [First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1997
Appears in:
Rank Score:
58,942
Rank in 1997:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Top rated album (92/100 - 5696 votes)  92 (5,696 votes)
Comments:
I recognize that it's unorthodox to place Adore so much higher than Mellon Collie. It's clear that Mellon Collie has a youthfulness that Adore can't match, but it is also uneven, disunified, and from time to time too cute for its own good. Adore has the further merit of exhibiting greater focus and attention to detail in the studio. This enables it to achieve textures that can match the complexity and depth of Corgan's lyrics and delivery. And it's just so pretty - I'll gladly assign to it the title of most gorgeous album, even though it could use a bit more edge (that said, Pug, is quite aggressive, and is competitive with Shame as the album's strongest track). [First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1998
Appears in:
Rank Score:
1,908
Rank in 1998:
Rank in 1990s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Comments:
[First added to this chart: 11/15/2013]
Year of Release:
1972
Appears in:
Rank Score:
13,456
Rank in 1972:
Rank in 1970s:
Overall Rank:
Average Rating:
Top rated album (85/100 - 1507 votes)  85 (1,507 votes)
Comments:
Total albums: 100. Page 1 of 10
Don't agree with this chart? Create your own from the My Charts page!

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums composition

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums chart changes

There have been no changes to this chart.
TitleSourceTypePublishedCountry
Top 100 Greatest Music Albums nextorgdOverall chart2025Unknown
BEA Top 200 Reorganized According To My TastebonnequestionCustom chart2026
Albums with the Best SongsImaybeparanoidCustom chart2017Unknown
Top 100 Greatest Music AlbumsLightRayOverall chart2015
Top 100 Greatest Music AlbumsbarbarossaOverall chart2022Unknown
Top 100 Greatest Music Albumsfred911007Overall chart2016Unknown
Top 100 Greatest Music Albums Chicken4SaleOverall chart2018
If The BEA Overall Chart Had A One Album Per Artist Rule... RomanelliCustom chart2025
Top 90.3 Listener Voted AlbumsKEXPOverall chart2008United States
Top 100 Greatest Music AlbumsBloaf38Overall chart2020

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums similarity to your chart(s)


Join 50,000+ music fans


Join now It only takes a moment.

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums ratings

Average Rating: 
88/100 (from 13 votes)
  Ratings distribution Help Average Rating = (n ÷ (n + m)) × av + (m ÷ (n + m)) × AV
where:
av = trimmed mean average rating an item has currently received.
n = number of ratings an item has currently received.
m = minimum number of ratings required for an item to appear in a 'top-rated' chart (currently 10).
AV = the site mean average rating.

Showing latest 3 ratings for this chart.  | Show all 13 ratings for this chart.

Sort Sort by
RatingDate updatedMemberChart ratingsAvg. chart rating
 
80/100
 !
09/16/2018 21:23 sssvnnn  Ratings distribution  2,88183/100
 
100/100
 !
01/25/2017 01:45 Seab  Ratings distribution  1,99893/100
 
90/100
 !
12/06/2014 20:48 Antonio-Pedro  Ratings distribution  56290/100

Rating metrics: Help Outliers can be removed when calculating a mean average to dampen the effects of ratings outside the normal distribution. This figure is provided as the trimmed mean. A high standard deviation can be legitimate, but can sometimes indicate 'gaming' is occurring. Consider a simplified example* of an item receiving ratings of 100, 50, & 0. The mean average rating would be 50. However, ratings of 55, 50 & 45 could also result in the same average. The second average might be more trusted because there is more consensus around a particular rating (a lower deviation).
(*In practice, some charts can have several thousand ratings)

This chart is rated in the top 10% of all charts on BestEverAlbums.com. This chart has a Bayesian average rating of 87.9/100, a mean average of 90.4/100, and a trimmed mean (excluding outliers) of 89.3/100. The standard deviation for this chart is 7.2.


Please log in or create an account if you want to be able to leave a rating

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums favourites

Showing all 1 members who have added this chart as a favourite

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums forum mentions

This chart has been referenced 1 time on the forums, Explore the wider forum discussion to see what members have said about it.
“Today's chart of the day Top 50 Greatest Music Albums by RawlsRE () 1. Kid A by Radiohead (2000) 2. Outside by David Bowie (1995) 3. The Lamb Lies Down On Broadway by Genesis (1974) 4. The Downward Spiral by Nine Inch Nails (1994) 5. Scary Monsters (And Super Creeps) by David Bowie (1980) 6. Adore…”
(1 mentions across Chart of the Day topics)
View latest topic →

Top 100 Greatest Music Albums comments

Showing latest 5 comments | Show all 13 comments |
Top Comments First | Newest First | Positive Sentiment First | Longest Comments First
(Showing comments with any number of votes. Manage Profile)
From 02/11/2014 03:53 | #102845
This is my original chart intro. I've come to recognize that my intro should be very short since it appears at the top of EVERY page of my chart. I'm saving the original here in order to embarrass my future selves:

As far as I am able, I've designed this list to track aesthetic excellence. I'm aware that the view (call it aesthetic realism) according to which there ARE any aesthetic entities to track is not a popular one. This is because it is incompatible with aesthetic relativism, which is the most favoured metaphysical approach to aesthetics in the English speaking world today. Of course, no relativism can recommend itself without contradiction - we cannot as a relativist say 'it is right to list albums as you like' without in this way making an exception to our relativism - but there is nonetheless an undeniable plausibility to this view where aesthetics are concerned. I think that this is because of the complexity and inscrutability of the object. Schopenhauer categorized music as the most abstract and elusive of the arts - this is how it is able to mesmerize us with glimpses of primordial unities, noumenal manifolds, and other transcendent/transcendental mysteries. But it also means that it is especially difficult to hang any conceptual framework onto it.

Given this difficulty, we must recognize a set of burdens of judgment when it comes to discussing music. These burdens explain how reasonable, honest and perceptive persons can disagree about which album is best. Of course they will disagree! The problem of ranking the greatest albums of all time is an extremely difficult one - we wouldn't be so transfixed by it if it weren't. But to say that it is difficult is not to say that there is no answer. This is all to say that we can be aesthetic realists rather than aesthetic relativists while still being civil to one another, even when we can't see eye to eye about the brilliance of Gentle Giant.

Acknowledging aesthetic burdens of judgment doesn't mean that we aren't obligated to try to address them. More than anything else, this requires honesty, that is, purging biases, setting allegiances to the 'little guys' aside, forgetting happy memories of listening to the last vestiges of Canadian alternative in the summer of '99, etc. I recognize that I haven't done a good job of this (yet). There are certain genres that I'm disposed to overvalue, namely Prog and Industrial. While I think these genres deserve more attention than they traditionally receive, it seems likely that their significance is inflated in this list. I'm trying to account for this, but it seems disingenuous to simply subtract two spots, say, from every Prog album on the assumption that this will correct for some prejudice or other that I can't yet identify. More damning, my list is full of white men - as far as I can tell, it includes only one non-Caucasian and two women. I don't mean to suggest that one ought to subordinate aesthetics to political considerations, but it is awfully suspicious (my list is also predominantly British, but for the moment I don't find this terribly worrisome). The best I can manage for the time being is to register that this list is in a number of ways provisional. My hope is that by living with it for a little while, it will reveal its errors to me.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Log in to reply
From 12/18/2013 17:43 | #97998
You are one of the most verbose users I've ever seen. But it's okay, because I'm interested in what you have to say.

And this chart is quite nice! I look forward to seeing your top 100 when the time is right.

You're comment on "You Forgot It In People" was a mighty impressive first post. I think my first post was something dumb like "I likey sis. It's coooooool".

Anyway, welcome, my friend.

Recs: check out "Ocean Songs" by The Dirty Three if you haven't already. It's excellent.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Log in to reply
From 01/23/2014 21:03 | #101357
This is a reply to SuedeSwede's comments:

I really need to change that introduction. It's just a journal entry, really - I wanted to record my thoughts as I first built the list. I didn't realize at that point that the three giant paragraphs would appear over every page.

Evidently, the intro is misleading AS WELL as long and obnoxious. I didn't mean to suggest that this isn't a list of my favourites. It's as you said - "it's too hard to actually get a concrete list from best to worst by aesthetics ... unless you have included your own opinion." Opinions are great. They're a big help in navigating aesthetic truth. They're also extremely responsive to that truth, or anyway that's my experience. The second I realized as a teenager that I only listened to Matthew Good Band only because it was my first musical interest, I was able to see it for what it really is, and my opinion changed accordingly.

Quantitative and qualitative are categories used to describe social scientific methodologies. I do not believe that music can be the subject of scientific inquiry. But then, science isn't the only way to arrive at the world as it actually is. There are a number of alternate strategies at our disposal.

I prefer reflective equilibrium, which is a device that John Rawls came up with (hence RawlsRE), though the thrust of it goes all the way back to Plato's notion of knowledge via recollection. It's a simple idea, but I'm inarticulate... it's a matter of fitting gut feelings into systems, and then designing systems so as to capture gut feelings, then reconsidering the gut feelings, then reconsidering the systems, until we find an equilibrium between the two. Ideally, the systems will work the gut feelings pure, so that they come to accurately represent things as they (objectively?) ought to be. Systems by themselves are empty, and gut feelings by themselves are gibberish, so we find a way to mesh them together. I suppose this way of putting it makes it sound unwieldy, but we perform these kinds of calculations all the time (or so Rawls and I believe), and we're really quite good at it.

That's what makes this site so handy. I have plenty of gut feelings, but I have no structures with which to systematize them. BEA equips me with the means to compile and analyze lists - an ideal systematizing tool. This has made it a lot easier to get to know my tastes.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Log in to reply
From 12/21/2013 21:43 | #98305
Ha! Yeah I suppose I, too, am overly verbose at times. ;-)

I appreciate that lil reference to Nick Cave's album. I will check that out. When I was listening to "Ocean Songs" the album I kept being reminded of was Dylan's "Desire". They obviously share the element of violin use, but also just some of the melodies and emotions on there stirred up memories of listening to "Oh Sister" and other "Desire" songs.

I am now getting really really into Neil Young more than ever. This very second I'm listening to "Zuma". It's awesome! Anyway, that was a TOTALLY random comment.

Yeah, my comments get lazier and shorter as I go later in the list so the top 30 is a nice stopping point.

I just saw you had NIN's "The fragile" in top 10. I am intrigued. That was my first album I ever owned. Got it for 10th birthday. To this day I consider that to be brilliant. And the rhythm and the just the production on there is so vivid and up front and clear. It's very nice. I recently learned that Steve Albini helped with the production on it! That explains a lot.

Anyway, keep it real. Keep posting and rating and commenting and get to where you can do a top 100. I'm VERY interested.
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 0
Log in to reply
From 12/21/2013 00:29 | #98239
You have very unique taste, Great to see another Kid A topping chart
Helpful?  (Log in to vote) · 1
Log in to reply
Anonymous
What do you think of this chart? Join the conversation!!

Log in or create an account to rate this chart, leave comments or join the discussion.